Mae Flexer, co-chair of the Connecticut legislative committee that sponsored the measure. and that’s their only opportunity to participate in our democracy - is a little dated,” said Democratic state Sen.
#Thumbs up for the go getters free
“The idea that everybody has free time on a Tuesday between 6 a.m. Supporters in Connecticut hope this time is different - both because the new version is more clearly written and because the vote comes after the coronavirus pandemic heightened awareness about early voting. A similar ballot proposal failed in 2014. Connecticut's November ballot will feature a proposed constitutional amendment authorizing the Democratic-led General Assembly to create an early voting law. Just four states - Alabama, Connecticut, Mississippi and New Hampshire - lack an in-person early voting option for all voters. On the other side, Michigan Republican Party spokesman Gustavo Portela said the initiative "opens the door up for fraud” through the combination of early voting and a constitutional exception to showing photo ID. The goal of the new initiative is to “enhance the integrity and security of the elections by sort of modernizing how they’re administered and making them more accessible," said Khalilah Spencer, president of Promote the Vote, which backs the measure. Trump allies had tried to persuade canvassers to delay certifying the 2020 results. It also would expand early voting options, require state-funded return postage and drop boxes for absentee ballots, and specify that the Board of State Canvassers has only a “clerical, nondiscretionary” duty to certify election results. In Michigan next month, a ballot initiative would pre-empt Republican attempts to tighten photo identification laws by amending the state Constitution to include the current alternative of signing an affidavit. Arkansas requires voters to provide a copy of a photo ID when returning a mailed ballot. Only a few states - Georgia, Minnesota, Ohio - have similar proof-of-identity measures for mailed ballots, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. “You’re opening people up to greater potential identity theft,” Hill said. Mesnard, who sponsored the measure, said the intent is to “make the election as secure as possible” while addressing “a growing crisis in confidence" that could discourage some people from voting.īut rather than reassuring voters, tougher ID requirements could dissuade some from voting at all and actually lead to fraud by exposing personal information, said Darrell Hill, policy director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona, which opposes the measure.
#Thumbs up for the go getters license
People voting with mailed ballots - the vast majority in Arizona - would have to list their date of birth and either their driver’s license number, a state identification number or the last four digits of their Social Security number. It would require people voting in person to show a photo ID, and eliminate a current alternative of providing two documents bearing a person's name and address, such as a recent utility bill and bank statement.
:origin()/pre00/2858/th/pre/f/2016/157/c/6/that_fish_cray_by_tanger_rain-da57zb8.png "thumbs up for the go getters")
Republicans who control the Legislature subsequently placed a proposed constitutional amendment on the November ballot that would strengthen voter identification laws. After a six-month review focused on Arizona's largest county, a Trump friendly firm hired by Republican state lawmakers ended up with vote results confirming Democrat Biden's victory. It intensified after the 2020 election, as Republican President Donald Trump refused to acknowledge his loss to Democrat Joe Biden while pressing false claims of widespread fraud, and some Republican-led states responded by passing restrictive voting laws.Īrizona, which Biden won by about 10,500 votes, was one center of controversy. Supreme Court decision in Florida's exceptionally close race gave Republican George W. “The parties and their allies are fighting over every last voting rule and trying to make predictions about how they think it will help or hurt their chances of winning, particularly in closely competitive states," said Sherman, litigation director and senior counsel at the Fair Elections Center, a nonprofit that advocates for voting access.Įfforts to change voting laws ramped up after the 2000 presidential election, when a U.S. They mark an escalation of what voting expert Jon Sherman describes as “the voting wars” - battles between Democrats, Republicans and activist groups over laws specifying how people register, obtain mail-in ballots, prove their identity and cast ballots. Most of the measures are garnering little attention but could have profound effects on voting in some of the most politically competitive states for years to come. Voting-related proposals will be on the ballot in several other states, including a measure to adopt ranked-choice voting in Nevada that - if approved this year - would need a second vote in 2024 to take effect."
0 kommentar(er)
